(His review is linked below.)
http://taylormarshall.com/2014/12/into-the-woods-movie-a-dads-critical-review.html
Dear Dr. Marshall,
Not only have I seen the movie, but I have played in the
stage version of Into the Woods and
am very well acquainted with the text and music of this show. It’s obvious to
me from your remarks that you are less well acquainted. It is also obvious to
me that your agenda trumps your vision. Please allow me to open your eyes a
little.
The passage you quote to make your point about
nominalism/moral relativism is incomplete. You have taken part of a thought out
of its context and made it look like another thought. Far from leading people
away from true religion, the ethos put forward in Into the Woods clears away two millennia’s worth of cobwebs and
helps reveal Christ’s message in its pure form.
Once the Baker and Cinderella have told Jack and Red that
they have a responsibility to “decide” what’s right and good, they balance that
with the warning “Just remember, someone is on your side (our side), someone
else is not. While we’re seeing our side (our side), maybe we forgot they are
not alone. No one is alone.” The meaning is that while trying to discern/decide
right from wrong, we have to consider things from more than just our
perspective. Not only does this help build bridges of love and understanding
between people, but in so doing, we actually strengthen our own position by identifying
our own weaknesses.
We are human. We are very rarely given the grace of seeing the
entire picture. Even when it happens, we often misinterpret what we’ve seen.
This is why it is so critically important to regularly examine our perspectives
and positions for flaws in the light of someone else’s eyes so we can address
those flaws and correct them. Motes and
beams, anyone?
I was taught to be wary of evil calling itself good and good
evil. We see it happening all around us now. The theme of the novel and musical
Wicked, as well as the storyline of Maleficent, both gave me pause when I
first encountered them, and I was very careful when I examined what they had to
say not to swallow their premise uncritically. However, as the Wizard says in
the song “Wonderful” from Wicked, “A
man’s a crusader…or ruthless invader. A rich man’s a thief or philanthropist…it’s
all in which label is able to persist.” There are many sides to any story, and
we would do well to consider them all. Some might say this is leading us to
have sympathy for the devil, but what it actually does is help us to judge
actions separate from people, gain a better perspective, and in doing so,
discern a more effective and less morally-questionable response. Neither these
two shows nor Into the Woods promote the nominalism you accuse them of.
Some actions are just
evil, and the unrepentant who commit them should be held accountable, but
things sometimes truly aren’t what they seem on the surface. For example, during
World War II, Caucasian Americans were taught to distrust all Japanese people
and we consequently treated Japanese Americans horribly. A more careful
examination might have helped us avoid that error and identify who our enemy
truly was…those who were seeking to deprive other humans of life and liberty. Instead,
we became our enemy, doing many of the same things the Nazis and Japanese did. Similar demonization of all Muslims is going
on, but not all Muslims are guilty of terrorism.
Learning to love others unconditionally is the core message
Christ imparts to His disciples. Anything that takes us away from that love is
what we need to question. We especially need to love those with views different
from ours or those who maltreat us. Getting past the blame game so beautifully
depicted in the show is what allows us to love in a Christ-like way.
There are so many philosophical statements in Into the Woods, both overt and implied,
that have actually helped me draw closer to Christ’s love and see through the sectarian
and dogmatic confusion that shrouds Christ’s message of what love and virtue
really are. I think you would do well to take a closer, more open-minded look
at the entire text for the stage version of Into
the Woods before making such an ill-informed condemnation.
Sincerely,
Trent Clegg
No comments:
Post a Comment